Case Report


Unusual cause of urinary retention in an infant

,  ,  

1 MBBS, FCPS, Fellowship in Pediatric Surgery, Ex-resident, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan

2 MBBS, FRCS (GLAS), FRCS Ed, Fellowship in Pediatric Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan

3 MBBS, Ex-student, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan

Address correspondence to:

Taimur Iftikhar Qureshi

MBBS, FCPS, Fellowship in Pediatric Surgery, Ex-resident, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi 74800

Pakistan

Message to Corresponding Author


Article ID: 100025Z19TQ2024

doi: 10.5348/100025Z19TQ2024CR

Access full text article on other devices

Access PDF of article on other devices

How to cite this article

Qureshi TI, Arshad M, Rashid H. Unusual cause of urinary retention in an infant. J Case Rep Images Pediatr 2024;6(2):1–4.

ABSTRACT


Introduction: Gastrointestinal tract duplication cysts constitute a rare group of malformation. Patients with presacral mass present with a diagnostic challenge due to the less obvious presentation.

Case Report: We report a 7-month-old boy, who presented with constipation and acute intermittent urinary retention. On per-rectal examination, a palpable mass was felt posteriorly with a narrow base, raising a query of pre-sacral/pelvic mass. Ultrasound pelvis revealed a well-defined, rounded oval-shaped cystic mass noted in the center of the lower pelvis, posteriorly. Computed tomography (CT) scan abdomen confirmed a cystic pelvis mass anterior to the rectum causing mass effect. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis was done to define its relationship to the sacral spine. A high-intensity lesion was seen on T2 imaging with no spinal involvement. Hence surgical exploration was done, and per operative diagnosis of rectal duplication was confirmed. Postoperatively child was discharged on the fourth post-operative day and doing well on follow-up.

Conclusion: We emphasize a complete examination, including per rectal examination in any child presenting with acute urinary retention to exclude pre-sacral masses.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal congenital duplicate cysts, Pediatric rectal duplication cyst, Pre-sacral mass

Introduction


Gastrointestinal tract duplication cysts constitute a rare group of malformations found along the alimentary tract ranging from the tongue to the anus. The reported incidence is 1:4500 births [1]. It has been claimed that the abdominal cavity accounts for about 75% of duplications, with the remaining 20% occurring intrathoracic or thoracoabdominal (5%). The most frequent kind of lesion is ileal (53%), which is followed by mediastinal (18%), colonic (13%), gastric (7%), duodenal (6%), and rectal (4%) duplication [2],[3]. Patients with presacral mass present with a diagnostic challenge due to the less obvious presentation. When symptoms do arise, they are typically brought on by the tumor’s bulk influence on the surrounding pelvic structures. These symptoms include lower leg paralysis, constipation, urinary retention, and venous or lymphatic obstruction of the legs [4]. The occurrence of a rectal duplication cyst causing retention of urine is uncommon and requires a high index of suspicion to detect. Mostly asymptomatic, patients with duplicate rectal cysts can present with a rectal mass, hence making a thorough per-rectal examination mandatory in these patients [5].

We herein present a case of patient with rectal duplication cysts who presented with acute urinary retention to highlight the challenges in the diagnosis of the concealed mass causing obstructive effects on the urinary tract that can lead to irreversible kidney damage. These effects are largely preventable with prompt detection and management which is curative once safely resected.

Case Report


A 7-month-old boy came with a history of constipation for three months and on-and-off urinary retention for two weeks. He was catheterized twice secondary to acute urinary retention. Birth history was unremarkable, and so was developmental history.

Clinical examination of the abdomen did not reveal any palpable abdominal mass or swelling, there were no ascites clinically neither was there any scrotal abnormality however a per-rectal examination revealed, a palpable mass posteriorly with a narrow base, raising a query of pre-sacral/pelvic lesion.

His basic hematological investigations were within the normal limits. Tumor markers, lactate dehydrogenase, alpha-fetoprotein, and beta HCG levels were also negative. Ultrasound pelvis revealed a well-defined rounded oval-shaped cyst noted in the center of the lower pelvis measuring approximately 4.3 × 3.0 cm. Computed tomography scan abdomen showed a well-circumcised walled cystic lesion located in the pelvis anterior to the rectum causing a compressive effect over the urinary bladder, urethra, and rectum (Figure 1). Its relation with the spine could not be identified; hence, MRI of the pelvis was advised which revealed a high-intensity lesion in the pelvis on T2 imaging with no spinal involvement, there was no spinal deformity (Figure 2).

With this pre-operative planning surgical exploration was planned, on examination under general anesthesia, there was a palpable mass just above the imaginary line drawn between the two anteriosuperior iliac spine. A Pfannenstiel incision was given, the bladder retracted, bilateral ureters were identified, and a cyst mass was revealed along the rectum tightly adherent to the base, where the mass shared a common wall with the rectum (Figure 3).

Surgical safe resection was not possible; hence, cyst was aspirated with drainage of mucoid clear fluid, cystostomy was performed, there was no luminal connection with the rectum, and excision of the cyst component was done with complete mucosal stripping. The cystic remnant was secured with an absorbable suture (Figure 4).

Histopathology revealed a cyst containing a fibromuscular wall with gastric-type mucosa.

Figure 1: Coronal and sagittal sections of CT-scan abdomen showing cystic mass in the pelvis in pre-sacral region abducting bladder anteriosuperiorly and sacrum posteriorly (arrow).

Share Image:

Figure 2: MRI pelvis showing high intensity lesion in the pelvis (asterisk).

Share Image:

Figure 3: (A) On examination under anesthesia (EUA), a palpable mass. (B) A cystic mass arising from the rectum.

Share Image:

Figure 4: Cyst wall opened (arrow) and mucosal stripping done (star).

Share Image:

Discussion


Based on their origins and histological characteristics, lesions known as retrorectal developing cysts can be divided into several categories. The most prevalent types include rectal duplication cysts, rectal cystic hamartoma, rectal teratoma, dermoid cysts, and epidermoid cysts [6]. There are two more widely recognized concepts for their embryogenesis: (a) the Veeneklass hypothesis, which explains the gastric epithelium by supporting a malseparation of the notochord, and (b) the less well-accepted Lewis–Thyng theory, which supports the presence of diverticula on the 8–9 week fetus [5],[7]. The least frequent type of rectal cysts is duplicates [1],[8]. Rectal cysts can often be identified from the others primarily by their distinct histological characteristics. More specifically, rectal duplication cysts consist of a smooth-muscle-surrounded squamous portion coated in a transitional epithelium that secretes mucus. Regarding their diagnosis, they can be diagnosed mostly with CT or MRI scans; however, diagnosis can be a challenge due to the less obvious presentation [3],[8]. Treatment involves surgically safe cyst resection, with mucosal stripping. In case of nonresectibility providing internal drainage is a plausible option. Rectal duplication cyst is a rare entity, a differential to consider in children with reported pre-sacral mass. Common presentation is in the form of mass effect. Clinical examination and pre-operative screening are important to rule out more common differential diagnoses of a pre-sacral mass.

Conclusion


It is important to conduct a thorough examination, including per rectal examination, in every child who presents with acute urinary retention. This examination is essential to rule out the presence of pre-sacral masses.

REFERENCE


1.

Schalamon J, Schleef J, Höllwarth ME. Experience with gastro-intestinal duplications in childhood. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000;385(6):402–5. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

2.

Puligandla PS, Nguyen LT, St-Vil D, et al. Gastrointestinal duplications. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38(5):740–4. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

3.

Olajide ARL, Yisau AA, Abdulraseed NA, Kashim IOO, Olaniyi AJ, Morohunfade AOA. Gastrointestinal duplications: Experience in seven children and a review of the literature. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2010;16(2):105–9. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

4.

Patel MP, Meisheri IV, Waingankar VS, Ramesh S, Naregal AM, Muthaal PB. Duplication cyst of the pylorus – A rare cause of gastric outlet obstruction in the newborn. J Postgrad Med 1997;43(2):43–5. [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

5.

Casteels A, Lenoir P, Vandenplas Y. Rectal duplication cyst. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1995;20(4):443–4. [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

6.

Azatçam M, Altun E, Avci V. Histopathological diagnostic dilemma in retrorectal developmental cysts: Report of a case and review of the literature. Turk Patoloji Derg 2018;34(2):175–8. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

7.

Narci A, Dilek FH, Cetinkurşun S. Anal canal duplication. Eur J Pediatr 2010;169(5):633–5. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

8.

Rajah S, Ramanujam TM, Anas SR, et al. Duplication of the rectum: Report of four cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int 1998;13(5–6):373–6. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

SUPPORTING INFORMATION


Author Contributions

Taimur Iftikhar Qureshi - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Muhammad Arshad - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Hina Rashid - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Guaranter of Submission

The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.

Source of Support

None

Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Copyright

© 2024 Taimur Iftikhar Qureshi et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.